|
News Articles
|
Wilkes-Barre Citizens' Voice
July 15, 2007
Forty
Fort Meeting House celebrates anniversary
by William
Kashatus
It
may be sound advice in the 21st century, but hardly applies to colonial
times when
Connecticut
settlers founded the
Wyoming
Valley
.
Those colonists viewed
the discussion of religion and politics as fundamental to the success and
prosperity of their community and created an institution strictly for that
purpose — the meetinghouse.
This year marks the 200th anniversary of the Forty Fort Meeting House, a
National Historic Landmark. Betsy Condron, chairwoman of the bicentennial
committee, said the structure is the “oldest existing house of worship not
only in the
Wyoming
Valley
, but throughout
Northeast Pennsylvania
.”
Bicentennial Week is set for Sept. 30 through Oct. 6 and includes an
old-fashioned vesper service, an art show, living history, special tours
with guides in period costume and much more.
The Forty Fort Cemetery Association, which maintains the Meeting House, is
making the dual focus of the celebration a $300,000 endowment initiative to
preserve the historic landmark and an educational initiative to teach the
public about the important role the building played in the settlement of the
Wyoming
Valley
.
“We hope to generate a lot of interest among the schools,” said Condron,
“especially the middle schools where local history is a required part of
the curriculum. If we can get the children interested in the history of the
Wyoming
Valley
, we have a better chance of insuring that important historic sites like the
Meeting House will be preserved for future generations.”
The origins of the Forty Fort Meeting House are rooted in colonial
New England
where members of the local community gathered inside such plain wooden
structures twice on Sunday to worship and during the midweek to discuss
community affairs and elect local officials.
They were God-fearing Calvinists who believed in the predestination of
humans to heaven or hell. Hoping to be among the former, they worked hard
and acted piously, expecting that God would reward them with earthly
posterity and salvation in an afterlife.
They also believed in participatory government. Specifically, that local
government was the most effective form of preserving the interests and
addressing the needs of the community.
The unique combination of democratic participation and hierarchical
authority was best represented by the meetinghouse and formed the worldview
of these Connecticut Yankees.
Predictably, members of
Connecticut
’s Susquehanna Land Co., sought to transplant the meetinghouse to
Northeastern Pennsylvania
when, in 1769, they arrived in the
Wyoming
Valley
to establish a permanent settlement.
But these “First Forty” settlers were forced to postpone their plans
when they discovered that the region was occupied by
Pennsylvania
colonists.
The so-called “Pennamites” insisted that they held title to the land
under the 1681 charter granted to William Penn by King Charles II of
England
. Their claim refuted an earlier 1662 charter the king granted to
Connecticut
.
Subsequent clashes between the two groups resulted in a series of bloody
confrontations known to history as the “Yankee-Pennamite Wars.”
A brief peace was established during the American Revolution, when the two
factions put aside their differences to unite in the struggle for
independence from
Great Britain
.
But the Yankee-Pennamite wars resumed afterwards, lasting until 1799 when
the
Pennsylvania
legislature secured a resolution with the
Connecticut
claimants.
With peace restored, the
Connecticut
settlers of
Kingston
(later renamed “Forty Fort” after the first 40 Yankee settlers who
arrived in 1769) turned their attentions to establishing a house of worship.
By 1800, the
Wyoming
Valley
had become a polyglot of Protestant Christianity.
Congregationalists (Calvinists who later became Presbyterians),
Episcopalians and Methodists comprised the religious landscape.
Denominational differences were not as important as the practical
consideration of building a place of worship.
In spring 1806, subscriptions were raised to build a meetinghouse. By end of
the next summer, a timber frame structure had been elevated and the interior
was finished during the following winter.
Originally known as the Union Chapel because it served as a house of worship
for Congregationalists and Methodists, the Meeting House was designed by
Joseph Hitchcock, an architect and builder from New Haven, Conn.
“The Meeting House is a fine example of Yankee Colonial architecture,”
said Condron. “It has a symmetrical design that can be seen both outside
and inside the structure.”
The exterior features 29 double-hung sash windows arranged in two tiers
directly over each other on each of the four sides. Each window has 24 panes
of glass.
On the north side of the building is an elegant palladium window,
strategically placed to furnish light for the pulpit located on the inside
of the wall. A five-paneled double door is centered on the south side,
providing entry into the structure.
Inside, the visitor feels as if he’s been transported back to the 18th
century. The handcrafted pine interior has never been painted. Normally
light in color, the pine has darkened with age.
The focal point of the interior is a highly elevated pulpit directly
opposite the entrance.
From here, such early ministers as Ard Hoyt, Cyrus Gildersleeve, Nicholas
Murray and E. Hazard Snowden delivered their sermons to devout
congregations.
Conspicuously absent are an altar,
baptismal font and religious statuary. The only suggestion of a crucifix is
the simple cross motif formed by the rails and styles of the wood paneling
that compose the pulpit. The absence of these features is a reminder of the
primitive as well as ecumenical nature of religion in the early
Wyoming
Valley
.
Enclosed pine pews are located on either side of the Meeting House. They
were reserved for the most prominent families of the community — the
Dorrances, Hoyts, Denisons, Swetlands and Shoemakers — while the less
renowned congregants worshipped on the wood-framed balcony above.
The Forty Fort Meeting House served as a place of worship until 1837 when
the Presbyterians and Methodists built their own churches. Afterwards, the
building and the adjoining cemetery were largely neglected.
Not until 1860, when the Forty Fort Cemetery Association was established,
was there a concern for the stewardship of the historic site. At that time,
William Swetland, the association’s first president, replaced the roof,
painted the exterior and repaired the fence.
Over the next 130 years, only cosmetic repairs were made to the exterior.
The escalating cost of historic preservation made it extremely difficult for
structural repairs that inevitably occur in centuries-old buildings.
In the early 1990s, Mrs. Lindsay Coon Robinson, then president of the
Cemetery Association, became concerned about the ongoing deterioration of
the Meeting House. She established a preservation committee to raise the
money needed to maintain the historic structure.
Today, the preservation committee, headed by Lillian Smith, faces its most
daunting challenge — to raise a $300,000 endowment that will help pay for
extensive structural repairs to the Meeting House that have occurred
naturally due to the “settling” of the building over many decades of
time.
Rotted wooden piers that support the foundation must be replaced with
concrete. The supporting cross beams of the roof must be reinforced. Brick
chimneys need to be rebuilt, repointed and reinforced with a structural
steel frame that spans the height of the attic. Extensive repairs also need
to be done on exterior woodwork, window frames and shutters, entrance door
and stoop and gutters.
“If we are going to succeed in this effort, we need ongoing public
support,” said Smith. “Old buildings require constant preservation and
that, in turn, requires financial stewardship. We are fortunate that the
Meeting House is still here. Had it not been located in the cemetery, it
probably would have been razed years ago. We owe it to the past and to
future generations to preserve this historic treasure.”
Currently, the Cemetery Association has received funding from the
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, the Pennsylvania Department
of Community and Economic Development and several local funding sources,
including the Bergman Foundation, the Marquis-McDonald Foundation, the
Dorothy Darte Darling Foundation and Celebrity Luncheon of Wilkes-Barre
Scranton.
Public donations have also been received. But ongoing public support will be
necessary if the $300,000 endowment goal is to be achieved.
The Forty Fort Meeting House stands as a legacy to the spiritual fortitude,
fierce determination and moral courage of the Connecticut Yankees who
settled the area.
But unless our community continues to preserve the irreplaceable structures
of the past, there will be very little for posterity on which to build a
future.
William Kashatus teaches history at
Luzerne
County
Community College
. He can be contacted at bkashatus@luzerne.edu.
©The Citizens' Voice 2007
|